.....shouting " this is our world", and, " this is a black world", but police are not ready to call it a hate crime............huh ??
How long do you think it would take them to call it a hate crime if the players in this story were reversed?
Why is it only called racism when it is committed by Caucasians?
Thursday, July 9, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
3 comments:
Calling it a hate crime helps no one.
But yes, I too am convinced if colors were swapped, it would be labelled a "hate crime". Maybe.
I believe that typical "hate crime" status only seeks to punish those that are not of minority status. That is, it may not be possible to label this a hate crime, even if it the crime is racial in its apparent motivation. The victims in this case are part of the (white) majority.
Pretty soon, though, if birth rates and immigration rates continue, whites will not be a majority in this country, so then whites will have hate crime "protection".
Oh wait, hate crime laws can't actually "protect" anybody, but let's just forget about that for the moment.
All "hate crime" laws are unconstitutional since they violate the equal protection clause of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court needs to strike down this special penalties. All crime involves some form of hate or contempt for the victim, anyway.
We have no business higher penalties for certain crimes against certain groups. Our core values mandate that all citizens receive the same protection of our laws and therefore, penalties for crimes against us must also be the same, without regard to gender or what gene pool you emerged from.
It is ironic that had the father been armed and elected to kill a few of their tormentors, he would surely have been tagged as having committed a "hate crime" and labeled in the Press as a "White Supremacist."
Had enough "DIVERSITY" yet?
I agree with both of you on your points;
Mine was not intended to defend the misguided notion of hate crimes, but to point out the hypocrisy on display.
Post a Comment